|
 
ow
would you like to hire better salespeople?
The type of achievers who consistently outperform your current
salespeople by 25, 50, or even 100 percent? In studies to
determine what separates top from average performing
sales managers, only one trait was identified that
distinguishes the best from the rest: the ability to
consistently recruit high achieving salespeople to their
organization.
Why is hiring
the right salesperson so important? Unlike other positions
where turnover cost might be one or two times salary, a poor
sales hire hits a company where it hurts most: lost market
opportunity. When factoring in this lost sales element to
the turnover equation, it's no wonder that one Northeast Ohio
CEO calculated that sales turnover costs his company over
$750,000 per individual!
What we'd like
for you to take away from this article are some action steps
that can help you avoid some of the predictable traps when
hiring your next salesperson.
| Action
Step 1 |
 |
Understand
the difference between threshold competencies and
differentiating competencies. Competencies are those
things that separate the top from the average performers.
Competencies differ from other dimensions of behavior in that
competencies are not teachable. Here's a quick definition of
each:
- Threshold
Competencies: Think of these as the ante in a
poker game. Competencies such as self-motivation,
communication, relationship-building and social skills
merely allow your new hire to play the sales game - not
win!
- Differentiating
Competencies: These competencies truly separate
the high level sales achievers from the rest of the pack.
For example, "Contextual Awareness" (a form of
curiosity/information seeking) is a differentiating
competency that comes naturally to top performers but can
be unteachable to salespeople scoring low in this area. An
individual who possesses this competency is constantly
gathering critical information throughout the selling
cycle that ultimately helps him/her land the order.
Individuals scoring high in this area are often described
as "street smart" in that they always "know
the score" in every selling opportunity.
| Action
Step 2 |
 |
Use the
most effective sales candidate assessment methods.
Assessment of sales candidates can take many forms. Smith,
Boyle, and Casio have identified the most effective methods in
ranked descending order (see chart below).
| Assessment
Method |
Criterion
Validity |
Average
Sales Increase |
| Critical
Incident Process Interview |
.61 |
+37% |
| Aptitudinal/Ability
Tests |
.53 |
+28% |
| Sales
Personality Tests |
.45 |
+20% |
| Biographical
Data (Biodata) Experience & Skills |
.35 |
+12% |
| References |
.23 |
+5% |
| Typical
Sales Interview |
.19 |
0% |
What the Research Indicates |
 |
Typical sales
interviews, reference checking and Biodata (such as sales
experience, industry knowledge, etc.) aren't very effective
predictors of sales success. Personality tests (validated
ones) and aptitude tests can be very helpful. But, clearly,
the best predictor is the Critical Incident Process of
interviewing where no hypothetical questions are asked.
Instead, only a candidate's achievements, and the - who, what,
where, when, why and how surrounding those achievements, are
painstakingly examined for traits common only to top sales
performers. |
|